Bungling council is slammed for ‘wasting’ £10,000 on 500ft-long cycle lane peppered with hazards including speed camera, bins, trees and lampposts which ‘make it more dangerous than cycling on the road’
- The route in Worcester includes a lamppost, a tree, bins and a speed camera
- The lane is right through the centre of the cycle lane next to a busy main road
- Worcestershire County Council spent £9,195 on and £5,000 on painting lines
Council chiefs have been slammed for ‘wasting’ more than £10,000 of taxpayers’ cash on a 150m-long cycle lane which is littered with obstacles.
The bike route in Worcester has been blasted by cyclists who are forced to zig-zag around numerous hazards.
Riders have to negotiate a lamppost, a tree, bins and a speed camera right through the centre of the cycle lane next to a busy main road.
It has now emerged Worcestershire County Council spent £9,195 on the lane, including £5,000 painting white lines and installing bollards.
The cycle lane on New Road in Worcester has multiple obstacles through it including a speed camera right through the centre of the lane… with a carefully painted white line around it
Despite attempting to encourage travellers to ditch their cars, the council have not made it easy for cyclists, who have to dodge a number of obstacles along the way into the city centre
A further £3,000 of taxpayers’ cash was spent closing part of New Road for three days while the cycle lane was installed in June this year.
Cycling campaign group chair, Dan Brothwell, labelled the project an ’embarrassment’.
The Bike Worcester chairman said: ‘It’s an embarrassment, I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
‘The coup de grâce is the effort spent painting a solid white line around the speed camera.
‘If the aim is to put Worcester on the map for comic reasons, the council are going about it the right way.
‘Rather than providing infrastructure that offers an improvement to people walking and cycling we are presented with this mess.
‘This does nothing to improve connectivity or continuity of the already shared use path on New Road.
‘The time, effort and money spent on this is a total waste, and could have had far more positive effect spent elsewhere in the city.’
Grandmother Janine Fowles, 58, from Worcester, said: ‘I got on my bike for the first time when it was installed but I was a bit surprised at the number of objects blocking the route.’
The lane has been slammed by cyclists who claim it is more dangerous than being on the main road. Janine Fowles (pictured), who cycles from Claines to St John’s for work, said she was surprised at how difficult it is to use
Cyclist Jon Marshall, 23, said he had almost crashed twice while using the cycle lane.
He said: ‘I cannot actually believe that the council have squandered ten grand on something which is worse than the road.
‘I came within a whisker of falling into the road when I had to swerve around a bin only to see a tree in front of me.
‘Another time I had to swerve around the speed camera but almost hit another cyclist coming the other way.’
Despite widespread criticism, the council insist the lane has been a success, resulting in ‘very little conflict’ between cyclists and pedestrians.
Councillor Mike Rouse, cabinet member for highways and transport, said: ‘Cycling infrastructure of any kind, which needs to follow strict government guidelines, is expensive and this is one of the reasons we can’t install as much as we would like as a council.
‘Someone is going to get hurt’: As well as speed cameras and lampposts, the new cycle route is also peppered with trees, which cyclists have to zig-zag around
‘With the New Road, we had a number of complaints about the conflict between pedestrians and cyclists on the combined New Road footway and cycleway.
‘Since the scheme was installed, monitoring has revealed that the scheme has been successful and that there is now very little conflict as most pedestrians and cyclists are using the segregated lanes which is really good news for both.’
The council is having to make up for years of lost ground on active travel having lost out on more than £500,000 after two ‘lacklustre’ bids for extra walking and cycling money fell short and a third was rejected outright.
The under fire council also received the worst possible ‘zero’ rating from Active Travel England, the new government body responsible for handling walking and cycling money.